Comments on: SQLite for Moscow ML http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/2005/01/27/sqlite-for-moscow-ml/ ... but that doesn't matter, because I turn it into a sexy dance Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:04:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Henning Niss http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/2005/01/27/sqlite-for-moscow-ml/comment-page-1/#comment-83 Henning Niss Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:00:48 +0000 http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/?p=28#comment-83 OK, I think we should shoot for MIT then. OK, I think we should shoot for MIT then.

]]> By: Ken http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/2005/01/27/sqlite-for-moscow-ml/comment-page-1/#comment-82 Ken Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:27:03 +0000 http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/?p=28#comment-82 Thus, the code for a SQLite binding should be released as public domain as well. Or something similar, like the MIT license. Thus, the code for a SQLite binding should be released as public domain as well. Or something similar, like the MIT license.

]]> By: Henning Niss http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/2005/01/27/sqlite-for-moscow-ml/comment-page-1/#comment-78 Henning Niss Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:48:16 +0000 http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/?p=28#comment-78 That sounds like a sound principle! But how to interpret this in this particular case? As far as I can tell the code in the "public domain". The only license information I could find is the following: <blockquote> "The original author of SQLite has dedicated the code to the public domain. Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or distribute the original SQLite code, either in source code form or as a compiled binary, for any purpose, commerical or non-commerical, and by any means." </blockquote> (from the SQLite web page). That sounds like a sound principle! But how to interpret this in this particular case? As far as I can tell the code in the “public domain”. The only license information I could find is the following:

“The original author of SQLite has dedicated the code to the public domain. Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or distribute the original SQLite code, either in source code form or as a compiled binary, for any purpose, commerical or non-commerical, and by any means.”

(from the SQLite web page).

]]> By: Ken http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/2005/01/27/sqlite-for-moscow-ml/comment-page-1/#comment-79 Ken Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:18:13 +0000 http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/?p=28#comment-79 I think that you should release your binding under the same or similar license as SQLite. I think it seldom makes sense to make a the license for language binding more restrictive than the library it binds to. I think that you should release your binding under the same or similar license as SQLite. I think it seldom makes sense to make a the license for language binding more restrictive than the library it binds to.

]]> By: Henning Niss http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/2005/01/27/sqlite-for-moscow-ml/comment-page-1/#comment-81 Henning Niss Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:42:13 +0000 http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/?p=28#comment-81 Oh, I forgot to mention that the code is going to look familar to people having worked on mGTK ;-) Oh, I forgot to mention that the code is going to look familar to people having worked on mGTK ;-)

]]> By: Henning Niss http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/2005/01/27/sqlite-for-moscow-ml/comment-page-1/#comment-80 Henning Niss Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:05:41 +0000 http://ken.friislarsen.net/blog/?p=28#comment-80 Of course I am going to release it under a suitable license, but since you are the "license guy" and you haven't yet told me which license to use for such matters these days, I haven't released anything. That and the fact that the binding is very far from complete :-) Of course I am going to release it under a suitable license, but since you are the “license guy” and you haven’t yet told me which license to use for such matters these days, I haven’t released anything.
That and the fact that the binding is very far from complete :-)

]]>